Best Local AI for Coding in 2026
Looking for the best local AI coding assistant? We compare Continue, Tabby, Cody, and more with setup instructions and real-world performance comparisons.
- •Best Overall: Continue.dev — free, open source, works with VSCode & JetBrains
- •Best Self-Hosted: Tabby — enterprise features, full team support
- •Best for Code Understanding: Cody — deep codebase intelligence
- •Easiest Setup: Codeium — install extension and go
- •Hardware: 8GB RAM minimum, 16GB+ recommended for best models
Why Use Local AI for Coding?
GitHub Copilot changed how developers write code, but it comes with real tradeoffs. Local alternatives offer compelling advantages:
Your Code Stays Private
With Copilot, every keystroke is sent to Microsoft's servers. Local AI processes everything on your machine — your proprietary code, trade secrets, and client work never leave your computer.
No Subscription Fees
Copilot costs $10-19/month per user. Local alternatives are free forever. For a team of 10, that's $2,280/year in savings.
Works Offline
Code on planes, in secure facilities, or during outages. Local AI doesn't need an internet connection.
No Rate Limits
Copilot can throttle usage during peak times. Local models have no restrictions.
Full Control
Choose your model, customize prompts, adjust parameters. No vendor lock-in.
Quick Comparison
| Tool | Price | IDEs | Setup | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continue | Free | VSCode, JetBrains | Easy | Most developers |
| Tabby | Free | VSCode, JetBrains | Medium | Teams |
| Cody | Free tier | VSCode, JetBrains | Easy | Code intelligence |
| Codeium | Free | 20+ IDEs | Very Easy | Quick start |
| Fauxpilot | Free | Copilot-compatible | Hard | API replacement |
1. Continue.dev — Best Overall
Continue is the most popular open-source AI code assistant. It integrates with VSCode and JetBrains IDEs to provide autocomplete, chat, and refactoring tools.
Key Features
- Autocomplete: Inline code suggestions as you type
- Chat: Ask questions about your code in a sidebar
- Refactoring: Highlight code and ask for improvements
- Local LLM support: Works with Ollama, LM Studio, and more
- OpenAI-compatible: Also works with GPT-4, Claude, etc.
Setup
- Install Continue from the VSCode marketplace
- Install Ollama and pull a code model:
ollama pull deepseek-coder-v2:16b - Configure Continue to use Ollama
2. Tabby — Best for Teams
Tabby is a self-hosted code completion server designed for teams. It runs on your infrastructure and provides completions to all team members.
Key Features
- Self-hosted: Run on your own servers
- Team support: Multi-user with usage analytics
- Repository indexing: Understands your codebase
- Admin dashboard: Monitor usage and manage users
- Fast inference: Optimized for low latency
Setup (Docker)
docker run -it \
--gpus all \
-p 8080:8080 \
-v ~/.tabby:/data \
tabbyml/tabby \
serve --model TabbyML/DeepSeekCoder-6.7B
3. Cody — Best Code Intelligence
Cody by Sourcegraph combines AI with deep code understanding. It knows your entire codebase, not just the file you're editing.
Key Features
- Codebase awareness: Understands your entire project
- Multi-repo support: Search across repositories
- Advanced refactoring: Architectural suggestions
- Test generation: Create comprehensive tests
- Local mode: Enterprise plan supports local LLMs
4. Codeium — Easiest Setup
Codeium offers a free individual tier with excellent autocomplete. It's the fastest way to get AI coding assistance.
Key Features
- Free forever: Unlimited autocomplete for individuals
- 20+ IDE support: VSCode, JetBrains, Vim, Neovim, and more
- 70+ languages: Supports virtually every programming language
- Fast suggestions: Typically under 200ms
- Self-hosted option: Enterprise plan available
5. Fauxpilot — Copilot Clone
Fauxpilot provides an API compatible with GitHub Copilot, so you can use existing Copilot plugins with your own local models.
Key Features
- Copilot API compatible: Works with existing extensions
- Model flexibility: Use any model you want
- Self-hosted: Full control over infrastructure
- NVIDIA Triton: Optimized inference backend
Setup Guide: Continue + Ollama
Here's the fastest way to get local AI coding assistance running:
Step 1: Install Ollama
# macOS/Linux
curl -fsSL https://ollama.ai/install.sh | sh
# Windows: Download from ollama.ai
Step 2: Download a Code Model
# Best overall coding model
ollama pull deepseek-coder-v2:16b
# Or smaller/faster
ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:7b
Step 3: Install Continue
- Open VSCode
- Go to Extensions (Cmd/Ctrl+Shift+X)
- Search "Continue"
- Click Install
Step 4: Configure Continue
- Open Continue sidebar (click icon in sidebar)
- Click settings gear
- Add configuration for Ollama:
{
"models": [{
"title": "DeepSeek Coder",
"provider": "ollama",
"model": "deepseek-coder-v2:16b"
}],
"tabAutocompleteModel": {
"title": "DeepSeek Coder",
"provider": "ollama",
"model": "deepseek-coder-v2:16b"
}
}
Step 5: Start Coding!
- Autocomplete appears as you type
- Press Tab to accept suggestions
- Highlight code and ask questions in Continue sidebar
- Use keyboard shortcuts for quick actions
Best Models for Code Completion
Top Coding Models
| Model | Size | Quality | Speed | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek Coder V2 | 16B | Excellent | Good | Most developers |
| Qwen 2.5 Coder | 7B | Very Good | Fast | Balance of speed/quality |
| Code Llama | 7B-70B | Good | Fast | Multiple size options |
| StarCoder 2 | 15B | Good | Good | Permissive license |
Download Commands
# Best overall
ollama pull deepseek-coder-v2:16b
# Fast option
ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:7b
# Smaller/Faster
ollama pull codellama:7b
Hardware Requirements
Minimum (7B Models)
- 8GB RAM
- Modern 4-core CPU
- No GPU required
Recommended (Better Quality)
- 16GB RAM
- Apple Silicon or 8GB GPU
- For 13-16B models
Optimal (Best Quality)
- 32GB+ RAM
- 16GB+ VRAM (RTX 4060/4090)
- For large models or multiple developers
Local AI vs GitHub Copilot
| Feature | GitHub Copilot | Local AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $10-19/month | $0 |
| Privacy | Code sent to Microsoft | 100% local |
| Offline | No | Yes |
| Quality | Excellent | Very Good (approaching Copilot) |
| Setup | Very Easy | Medium |
| Customization | Limited | Full control |
Verdict
Copilot still has a slight quality edge and is easier to set up, but local alternatives are catching up fast. For privacy-conscious developers and teams, local AI is now a viable, cost-effective alternative.
Hapi
AI-powered automation for modern teams
Automate repetitive tasks and workflows with AI. Save hours every week.
Try Hapi FreeFrequently Asked Questions
Explore All Local AI Chatbots
Browse our complete directory of 5+ local chat and AI assistant tools.
View Chat & Assistant Tools

